Texas - Dallas Fort Worth

15 DAY TEXAS DWI WARNING!

Because within as little as 15 days of your arrest you may automatically lose your drivers license and even your entire case by delaying your decision to hire an attorney, we strongly recommend that you complete a FREE CASE REVIEW immediately. Quickly obtaining a Texas DUI lawyer attorney, a Texas DWI lawyer attorney, or a Texas Drunk Driving lawyer attorney to review your case is extremely important! Please complete a FREE CASE REVIEW and submit it as soon as possible, and we will have an attorney in your area contact you immediately.

Dallas Fort Worth Texas Top DWI Defense Lawyer Attorney:

John M. Cook
2501 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 560 Dallas TX 75219
1-800-342-5394
email: johncookatty@msn.com

Ask a Question  - Free and Confidential!

Serving the following communities: Addison, Allen, Carrollton, Celina, Dallas, Duncanville, Ennis, Farmers Branch, Frisco, Garland, Grand Prairie, Irving, Italy, Kaufman, Lavon, Lewisville, McKinney, Mesquite, Midlothian, Plano, Renner, Richardson, Seagoville, Terrell, Waxahatchie Arlington, Cleburne, Euless, Fort Worth, Granbury, Grapevine, North Richland Hills, Rhome, Roanoke, Rockwall County, Saginaw, Weatherford Aspermont, Benjamin, Childress, Crowell, Decatur, Denton, Gainesville, Graham, Haskell, Mineral Wells, Wichita Falls

WHEN BEING CONVICTED OF A TEXAS DWI DRUNK DRIVING ARREST IS NOT AN OPTION!

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DWI (enter 214 when prompted) NOW TO DISCUSS YOUR DALLAS DWI OR FORT WORTH DUI DWI DRUNK DRIVING CASE OR

(Offices located in area codes 214, 972, 469, 903, 430, 682, 817, 940)

Defending Persons arrested for a Texas DWI Drunk Driving Charge throughout the Dallas Texas Area

About Texas DWI Defense Attorney John M. Cook :

Dallas Fort Worth Drunk Driving Lawyer John Cook is a Member of America's Top DUI & DWI Defense AttorneysTM for a reason:

John Cook wins Texas DWI cases.

John M. Cook is a graduate of Jacksonville State University in Jacksonville, Alabama majoring in Law Enforcement with a minor in English. He received his law degree from the South Texas College of Law in Houston, Texas, where he was a member of Phi Delta Phi honorary legal fraternity and received the American Jurisprudence Award for Criminal Procedure. Prior to attending law school, Mr. Cook was a police officer for 6 years with the City of Mesquite, Texas Police Department, with the last two years as a Detective in their criminal investigations division. After graduating from law school, Mr. Cook served as an Assistant District Attorney with the Dallas County District Attorney's Office. He is now in private practicce and has limited his practice to the defense of Texas criminal cases in both Texas state and Texas federal courts with most of his cases involving Texas D.W.I. Mr Cook has previously lectured on jury selection in Texas DWI cases at the Dallas County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association Annual Texas DWI Seminar. He is a member of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the National Association of Criminal Defense lawyers and the National College of DUI Defense.

Mr. Cook has also lectured on the Cross-Examination of Police Officers in Texas DWI Arrests at a seminar in Houston Texas.

Choosing the Right Texas DWI Lawyer

What Are Drunk Driving Field Sobriety Tests?

Drunk Driving DWI Field Test Realities

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DWI (ext. 214) NOW TO DISCUSS YOUR DALLAS DUI DWI DRUNK DRIVING CASE OR

Texas DWI Drunk Driving Attorney John Cook's Message to Persons Arrested for a Texas DWI Drunk Driving charge:

My approach is simple; use my vast experience as a former police officer and prosecutor, knowledge, and proven trial skills to aggressively and successfully represent you. My creative approach often is the difference between a drunk driving conviction and a dismissal, reduction in the charge, or being found Not Guilty on the drunk driving charge.

I have extensive experience as a defense attorney in Dallas Fort Worth Denton Counties and surrounding communities. I will aggressively represent you because a conviction on your record will be there forever.

Understanding results obtained depend on the facts of each case, my experience in Dallas, Ft. Worth, Denton, Collin, Rockwall, Kaufman, Rusk, Cook, Smith, and Navarro counties defending Texas DWI DUI and drunk driving cases have resulted in NOT GUILTY verdicts and/or total dismissal of all DWI charges in cases, even where:

  • Drunk driving accidents have occurred;
  • DWI clients have failed all field sobriety tests;
  • DWI breath test results over the legal limit;
  • DWI blood test results over the legal limit.

I hope you find the information on "America's Top DUI & DWI Defense AttorneysTM" website educational and helpful. I encourage you to take the time to learn more about the Texas DWI laws, and the necessity of hiring the best Texas DWI lawyer for you. By educating yourself, you will be better able to assist me in creatively creating a DWI defense specific to your case.

My goal is at the end of your DWI case, if someone you know were to ever get in trouble, you would, without hesitation, refer them to me. The only way I can earn this confidence in you is to win your case.

John Cook, Texas DWI Drunk Driving Defense Lawyer

Back to the Top of the Page

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DWI (ext. 214) NOW TO DISCUSS YOUR DALLAS DUI DWI DRUNK DRIVING CASE WITH JOHN COOK

OR

If being convicted is not an option, give me a call at:

1-800-DIAL-DWI

(Area codes 214,972,469,682,817,940)

"Not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization"

Ask a Question  - Free and Confidential!

  • Choosing the Right DWI Lawyer

Finding a lawyer who is experienced in handling DWI's should be your top priority. DWI laws are constantly changing and the consequences of a conviction are becoming harsher and harsher, not to mention the negative impact of being labeled a criminal for the rest of your life.

If you have never been through this before, you probably don't know who to call, and it seems lawyers are a dime a dozen. If you have been through this before and are searching for a different lawyer, you know just how important it is to hire an experienced DWI lawyer. You need to understand just because someone is a lawyer does not mean they have the necessary DWI experience to defend you and your DWI case. Further, not knowing what to look for in a DWI defense attorney makes the challenge of finding the right lawyer even more difficult. It is extremely important to find an experienced, competent DWI defense lawyer who knows how to investigate your case for factual and legal defenses, visit the scene with a camera for potential trial exhibits, interview witnesses, suppress evidence, compel discovery of offense reports and breath test maintenance records, negotiate for a dismissal or reduction in charges, obtain expert witnesses for trial, attempt to save your driving privileges, and who knows how to win the "difficult" case. In essence, you need a lawyer who will fight for you and leave no stone unturned in defending you. Remember, a conviction on your record will be there forever!

You should attempt to retain a lawyer who devotes the majority of their practice to defending DWI cases. A former police officer and prosecutor can add additional knowledge to the defense of your Texas DWI arrest. No lawyer can give you a guarantee on the outcome of your case (if one does, beware!); however, retaining a lawyer who concentrates on DWI defense will maximize your chances of being found Not Guilty.

If you do not have a sense of comfort and confidence after meeting with a lawyer about your case, you should continue to look.

After meeting with the lawyer, the following should be evident:

  • the lawyer has extensive experience in litigating and trying DWI's;
  • the lawyer has a reputation for going to trial (not for pleading clients guilty);
  • the lawyer has won difficult cases (they are not all talk);
  • you feel comfortable in the manner in which the lawyer communicated with you (If you are not comfortable, do you think the jury would feel comfortable?);
  • the lawyer listened to you (or did they do all the talking?);
  • the lawyer was genuinely interested in you and your case;
  • the financial agreement was clearly defined; and
  • you have a strong sense of confidence in their ability to professionally and competently handle your case!

I am a member of the National College for DUI Defense. This national organization is comprised of the best DWI/DUI lawyers from across the nation. I am in constant contact with members and we are a think-tank for ideas on how to successfully defend those accused of drunk driving. I have provided and obtained valuable information from this organization, along with proven, successful trial techniques that have assisted me in obtaining dismissals, reduction of the charges, and Not Guilty verdicts for my clients.

If being convicted is not an option, give me a call at 1-800-DIAL-DWI (area 214)

Back to the Top of the Page

  • What Are Field Sobriety Tests?

Field Sobriety Tests (FST's) are psychophysical tests used to assess a person's physical and/or mental impairment. They focus on the abilities needed for safe driving. Most of the more reliable psychophysical tests are known as "divided attention" tasks. They require a person to concentrate on more then one task at the same time. To safely drive a car, a person needs to be able to simultaneously control steering, breaking, and acceleration; react to constantly changing driving environment; and perform many other tasks. Alcohol affects one's ability to adequately divide attention, thus causing drivers to concentrate on more difficult tasks while ignoring simpler ones (i.e. ignore a traffic signal while concentrating on one's speed). Even if impaired, most people can successfully concentrate on a single task fairly well, but when impaired, most drivers cannot successfully divide their attention between multiple tasks at once.

Divided attention tasks are designed to evaluate mental and physical capabilities a person needs to safely drive a car. They include information processing; short-term memory; judgment and decision making; balance; steady, sure reactions; clear vision; small muscle control; and coordination of limbs. A good FST will combine any two or more of these capabilities simultaneously. A test must also be reasonably simple for the average non-intoxicated person to perform.

The most common FST's used by the police include the three standardized tests consisting of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus tests, Walk & Turn test, and the One Leg Stand test. These three tests have been validated as reliable indicators of intoxication, although they are not 100% accurate. Other commonly used, but non-standardized, tests include counting backwards, saying the alphabet (or a portion of it), finger count, and the stationary balance (Rhomberg) tests.

In reference to the three standardized FST's, the government has admitted, and it is printed in the police officers DWI manual, that "IT IS NECESSARY TO EMPHASIZE THIS VALIDATION ONLY APPLIES WHEN: THE TESTS ARE ADMINISTERED IN THE PRESCRIBED STANDARED MANNER; THE STANDARDIZED CLUES ARE USED TO ASSESS THE SUSPECTS PERFORMANCE; THE STANDARDIZED CRITERIA ARE EMPLOYED TO INTERPRET THAT PERFORMANCE. IF ANY ONE OF THE STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRITY TEST ELEMENTS IS CHANGED, THE VALIDITY IS COMPRAMISED."

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN)

This test refers to the involuntary jerking of the eye as it gazes to the side. When this occurs, the person is unaware of the jerking, and cannot control it. This involuntary jerking becomes noticeable as persons' blood alcohol increases. This is the most reliable of the FST's. However, nystagmus is a natural, normal phenomenon. Alcohol and certain drugs do not cause this phenomenon.

When the HGN test is administered, the officer hold a stimulus (usually a pen) 12-15 inches in front of you eyes and asks you to follow the stimulus with your eyes, without moving your head. The officer will always start with the left eye and they are looking for 3 specific clues:

1. Lack of Smooth Pursuit: As the eye moves from side to side, does it move smoothly or does it noticeably jerk (bounce)? The jerking is similar to how windshield wipers jerk across a dry windshield. There is a standardized pace the officer is to have the eyes move side to side. From the center of the face, they are to move the eye all the way out to the side in approximately 2 seconds, then 2 seconds back to center, approximately 2 seconds to the other side, and 2 seconds back to center. They are to repeat the procedure. If they have the eyes move too fast, not only are they performing the test improperly, the government has admitted that quick movement of the eyes may cause nystagmus.

2. Distinct Nystagmus at Maximum Deviation: When the eye moves as far to the side as possible and is kept in that position for several seconds, is there distinct jerking (bouncing) of the eye. The eye is to be moved all the way to the side, and kept there a minimum of 4 seconds. Interestingly enough, some people exhibit slight jerking of the eye at maximum deviation even when unimpaired! Also, if the eye is moved to the side too quickly, this may cause the nystagmus.

3. Onset of Nystagmus Prior To 45 Degrees: As the eye moves towards the side, does it start to jerk (bounce) before it reaches a 45-degree angle? When moving the eye out to 45-degree's, the movement of the eye should take approximately 4 seconds to reach 45-degrees. It is important to take the full 4 seconds when checking for onset. If the stimulus is moved too fast, the officer could take your eye beyond 45 degrees, or if the eye is moved to 45-degrees too quickly, this may cause the nystagmus.

The maximum number of clues in each eye is 3, for a total of 6 clues. The original research has shown that if 4 or more clues are present, the person is intoxicated. This test has been shown to be accurate 77% of the time; therefore, it is inaccurate 23% of the time!

Walk & Turn

This divided attention test consists of the instruction phase and the walking phase. During the instruction phase, the person must stand with the right foot directly in front of the left foot with the heel and toes touching, keeping their arms at their side, while listening to the instructions. One's attention is divided between keeping their balance and listening to and remembering the instructions. The instruction phase of the test takes at least 45 seconds to complete. If you use yours arms for balance in this awkward position of step out of the position, it will be taken as a sign of intoxication.

During the walking phase, the person takes 9 heel-to-toe steps, turns in a prescribed manner, take 9 heel-to-toe steps back, while counting the steps out loud. The steps are taken down a straight line, and if an actual line is not present, the person is instructed to walk down an imaginary line. The walking phase divides a person's attention between keeping their balance, counting out loud, taking the proper number of steps, turning in the prescribed manner, while keeping their arms at their side.

The officer is looking for 8 specific clues:
1. can't balance during instructions;
2. starts too soon;
3. stops while walking;
4. doesn't touch heel-to-toe;
5. steps off line;
6. uses arms for balance;
7. loses balance on turn or turns incorrectly; and
8. takes the wrong number of steps.

The original research has shown that if 2 or more clues are present, the person is intoxicated. This test has been shown to be accurate 68% of the time; therefore, it is inaccurate 32% of the time!

One Leg Stand

This divided attention test consists of the instruction phase and the balance & counting phase. During the instruction phase, the person must stand with their feet together, keeping their arms at their side while listening to the instructions. One's attention is divided between keeping their balance and listening to and remembering the instructions.

During the balance & counting phase, the person must raise one leg approximately 6 inches off the ground, arms at their side, toes pointed out and looking at the pointed toes, and keeping both legs straight. While looking at their toes, they are to count 1001, 1002, 1003, etc. until they are told to stop. The test is to last for 30 seconds and the officer is supposed to time the test. During the test, if at anytime a person puts their foot down, they are instructed to pick it back up and continue counting where they left off.

The officer is looking for 4 specific clues:
1. sways while balancing;
2. using arms for balance;
3. hopping; and
4. putting foot down.

The original research has shown that if 2 or more clues are present (i.e. putting foot down 1 time and having a couple seconds of sway), the person is intoxicated. This test has been shown to be accurate 65% of the time; therefore, it is inaccurate 35% of the time!

Counting Backwards (not a validated test)

This divided attention test requires a person to count out loud a set of numbers in reverse order. For example, the person is instructed to count starting with 56 and ending with 28. This divides the person's attention because they have to remember what number to start with, count backwards correctly, and remember what number to stop on. Anything other than 100% perfection will be viewed as a sign of intoxication.

Alphabet (nota validated test)

This test requires a person to recite a portion of the alphabet. For example, the person is instructed to start with a specific letter, D, and stop at a specific letter, T. This divides the person's attention because they have to remember the specific letter to start with, say the letters in sequence, and remember the letter to stop with. Anything less than 100% perfection will be viewed as a sign of intoxication.

Finger Count (not a validated test)

This test required a person to touch the tip of each finger in succession to the tip of their thumb, up and back, while counting 1, 2, 3, 4, .. 4, 3, 2, 1. They must touch fingertips while not counting out of order. Anything less then 100% perfection will be viewed as a sign of intoxication.

Stationary Balance (i.e. Rhomberg) (not a validated test)

This test requires a person to stand with heels and toes touching, leaning their head back to look up at the sky or ceiling, holding their arms out to the side (like an airplane) and estimate 30 seconds. The officer is looking for any unnatural sway. I have had officers testify from a range of anything more than ½ inch to 1 inch from center is too much sway and must be caused by intoxication. Also, if your estimation is not close to 30 seconds, this will be viewed as a sign of intoxication.

Try these Field Sobriety Tests at home with someone evaluating you and contact me with your results. Being sober, how many tests did you fail?

Even though officers have testified that all non-intoxicated people should be able to successfully perform Field Sobriety Tests (i.e. 100% accurate), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, through their extensive research, has acknowledges that:
- these tests lose their sensitivity if repeated;
- sober people have difficulty with balance;
- leg problems can affect these tests;
- back problems can affect these tests;
- middle ear problems can affect these tests;
- weight can affect the tests;
- age can affect the tests;
- footwear can affect theses tests; and
- weather conditions can affect the tests.

Back to the Top of the Page

  • Field Test Realities

What are the realities of performing Field Sobriety Tests?

The reality is that you will be asked to perform Field Sobriety Tests in less then ideal conditions when you are extremely nervous about being arrested. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has admitted that "Slight variations from the ideal, i.e., the inability to find a perfectly smooth surface at roadside, may have some affect on the evidentiary weight given to the results." But they do not indicate what is meant by "slight variations from the ideal" and how much "affect" that will cause. Even though the government has admitted this, police officers have consistently testified contrary to this statement, always stating the specific sidewalk, street, or highway shoulder they had my client(s) perform these tests did not affect how they performed, regardless of traffic, weather conditions, or photographs showing the uneven, rocky surfaces.

Further, once the officer asks you to exit your car and perform these tests, he is already suspicious that you are intoxicated, thus detracting from him being fair and unbiased. When the police officers have their academy training, and citizens volunteer to go the police training facility, get to drink for free, and then let officers give them field sobriety tests, several aspects of the "drinking school" will be different from your being asked to do these tests in the "field." First, those citizens are not nervous or scared about being stopped by the police. Second, they are in a controlled environment, not outside with all the distractions, and third, they are not in fear of being arrested. These three factors alone give many non intoxicated people difficulty in passing field sobriety tests.

Ideal conditions would be to perform the tests on a flat, smooth surface, inside with proper lighting, when you are not tired, with an officer who knows how to, and does, perform the tests in the prescribed standardized manner. In reality, the majority of the time people are asked to perform field sobriety tests under some or all of the following conditions:

  • early in the morning;
  • nervous & scared of being arrested;
  • tired from a long day;
  • poor lighting conditions;
  • poor weather conditions (wind, cold, rain, etc.)
  • on the shoulder of a highway/street;
  • standing on an uneven/slanted/cracked surface;
  • dirt & debris on the surface;
  • traffic driving by;
    • headlights are distracting you, causing you to notice the cars more, and headlights can affect the HGN test!
    • gusts of wind caused by the cars when you are on the shoulder of the highway (wind in your eyes can affect the HGN test, and your balance!)
    • semi's blasting by when you are on the shoulder of the highway (extremely unnerving when I stand on the shoulder during the daytime, taking photos of the shoulder where clients have been stopped)
  • police car strobe lights flashing, thus distracting your vision;
  • an officer standing in front of you shining a flashlight into your eyes;
  • an officer not following the prescribed, standardized manner in giving the tests; and/or
  • an officer who has prematurely made up his mind you are intoxicated and is only looking for verification (i.e. he won't give you a fair and unbiased evaluation during the tests).

Clearly, nobody could prepare themselves for conditions such as these. And remember, these Field Sobriety Tests may lose their sensitivity if repeated several times. Thus, the police want to evaluate you the very first time you attempt the tests, and don't you expect to see the most difficulty in performing a task the very first time you attempt it?

Back to the Top of the Page

The DUI attorneys and DWI lawyers listed on this site include nationally published authors on DUI laws and DWI laws. These Drunk Driving Defense Attorneys have appeared in over 75 local television stations and 229 newspapers nationwide.

Free Case Review

Book

Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence
This product provides an insider's perspective on the evolving technologies and procedures associated with the evidence associated with driving under the influence (DUI) charges. Leading defense attorneys guide the reader through the key stages and steps involved in successfully defending a client accused of driving while under the influence.

Ask A Question: Click Here