Michigan DUI OUIL Drunk Driving Laws

Find Michigan DUI Attorneys - Michigan Drunk Driving lawyers - Mich OUIL Attorneys

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI   (ext. 231) NOW TO DISCUSS YOUR MICHIGAN DUI DWI MICHIGAN DRUNK DRIVING CASE OR

Free case review Image

Summary of Michigan DWI Laws/ UBAL / OUIL / OWI / OUIN Laws

The following charts show the penalties for Michigan drunk driving and license suspension violations in Michigan.

Crime 1st Offense 2nd Offense
OUIL / UBAC / OUID
§625(1)
Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
1 or more of the following:
Up to 93 days jail; $100 - $500 fine; up to 45 days comm svc

Licensing: 30/150 days susp./rest.

Plate conf: None

Immob: Permissive up to 180 days

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
$200 - $1000 fine And one or more of the following: 5 days to 1 year jail; 30-90 days comm svc.

Licensing: minimum 1 year revocation/denial

Plate conf: Required

Immob: Required 90 to 180 days unless forfeited.

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

  1st Offense 2nd Offense
OWI
§625(3)
Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
1 or more of the following:

Up to 93 days jail; up to $300 fine; up to 45 days comm svc.

Licensing: 90 days rest.

Plate conf: None

Immob: Permissive up to 180 days

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
$200 - $1000 fine And one or more of the following: 5 days to 1 year jail; 30-90 days comm svc.

Licensing: minimum 1 year revocation/denial

Plate conf: Required

Immob: Required 90 to 180 days unless forfeited

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

  1st Offense 2nd Offense
Zero Tolerance
§625(6)
Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
Up to $250 fine OR up to 60 days comm svc, or both.

Licensing: 30 days rest.

Plate conf: None

Immob: None

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
One or more of the following: up to 60 days comm svc; up to $500 fine; up to 93 days jail.

Licensing: 90 day susp OR if prior §625 then minimum 1 year revocation/denial

Plate conf: None

Immob: None

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

  1st Offense 2nd Offense
Child Endangerment
§625(7)
Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
$200 - $1000 fine AND one or more of the following: 5 days to 1 year jail; 30-90 days comm svc.

Licensing: 90/90 susp./rest.

Plate conf: None

Immob: Permissive up to 180 days

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

Felony

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
$500 - $5000 fine And either of the following: 1-5 years prison; probation with 30 days to 1 year jail AND 60-180 days comm svc.

Licensing: minimum 1 year revocation/denial

Plate conf: Required

Immob: Required 90 to 180 days unless forfeited

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

Endangerment - Zero Tolerance w/occupant < 16

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
One or more of the following: up to 60 days comm svc; up to $500 fine; up to 93 days in jail.

Licensing: 90/90 susp./rest.

Plate conf: see 1st, 2nd offense

Immob: see 1st & 2nd

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
$200 - $1000 fine AND one or more of the following: 5 days to 1 year jail; 30-90 days comm svc.

Licensing: revoke

Plate conf: see 1st, 2nd offense

Immob: see 1st & 2nd

Reg Deny: None

Forf: Permissive

  1st Offense 2nd Offense
.04 CDL Commercial Drivers License
§625m(1)
Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
Up to $300 fine OR up to 93 days jail, or both

Licensing: CDL - 1 year susp., OPR 90 days rest., HAZ - 3 year susp.

Plate conf: None

Immob: Permissive up to 180 days

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

Misdemeanor

Fine/Jail/Comm Svc:
Up to $1000 fine OR up to 1 year prison, or both

Licensing: CDL - minimum 10 yr rev., OPR 1 yr rev./den.

Plate conf: Required

Immob: Required 90 to 180 days

Reg Deny: None

Forf: None

  1st Offense 2nd Offense
Drug Law Violations Misdemeanor

ALL

Licensing: 30/150 susp./rest.

Misdemeanor

ALL

Licensing: 60/365 susp./rest.

  2003 Changes to Michigan's Drunk Driving Laws
(
DWI / UBAL / OUIL / OWI / OUIN )

OVERVIEW

In July of 2003, the Michigan legislature passed and the Governor signed into law two bills designed to bring Michigan into compliance with the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration's requirement that all states adopt a blood alcohol threshold of .08% for drunk driving offenses. Although the amendments make this change, they includes a number of other significant changes to the existing law. The following are some of the more significant changes.

OPERATING WHILE INTOXICATED

The legislation changes the name of the offense from Operating Under the Influence of Liquor to Operating While Intoxicated. That offense includes both operating with a blood alcohol level of .08% or more, as well as operating while under the influence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance.

OPERATING WHILE IMPAIRED

The legislation retains the offense of Operating While Visibly Impaired. However, there is no longer a blood-alcohol threshold used to prove OWI.

PRESUMPTIONS GONE

Under the prior statue, a person was presumed OUIL if he or she had a BAC of .10% or greater; OWI if he or she had a BAC of greater than .07% but less than .10%; and not impaired if he or she had a BAC of .07% or less. Those presumptions are gone from the new legislation. While it is unlawful to drive with a BAC of .08% or more, there is no longer a presumption that a person is not impaired with a BAC of .07% or less. Thus, it is possible for a prosecutor to charge impaired driving even if a person has a BAC level of .07% or less.

NEW OFFENSE OF DRIVING WITH ANY AMOUNT
OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE

Bound to be one of the most controversial aspects of the new legislation, the statute now includes the offense of Operating with Any Amount of a Schedule 1 Controlled Substance (opiates, opium derivatives, hallucinogens, marijuana, GHB, and ecstasy) or cocaine in the blood stream. This part of the new statute has nothing to do with keeping impaired drivers off the road since most of these drugs can be found in the blood stream days after they were taken while the impairment is usually gone in hours. In fact, with a hair test, it is possible to find these substances in a person's body up to 90 days after the fact. Since the new statute prohibits a person from operating a vehicle if "the person has in his or her body any amount" of a controlled substance, this is presumably not limited to breath, blood or urine. The new offense is treated the same as Operating While Intoxicated in terms of jail time, fines, costs, community service, and licensing sanctions.

IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICES

The new statute allows the court to require the installation of an ignition interlock device as a condition of probation for both driving while intoxicated and driving with any amount of a controlled substance. Thus, while an offender may have only a six month license suspension from Secretary of State, the court can require the ignition interlock device installed throughout the term of probation (up to two years).

COURT CANNOT ALLOW PLEA TO ZERO TOLERANCE IF ORIGINALLY CHARGED WITH GREATER OFFENSE

The new legislation slightly changes the rules regarding pleas to zero tolerance offenses. Where the old statute allowed the court to accept a reduced plea from another alcohol offense to a zero tolerance offense with agreement of the prosecutor, the new law only allows the court to dismiss the original charge on motion of the prosecuting attorney. Thus, reduced pleas to zero tolerance offenses, while still possible, will be more cumbersome.

PRESUMPTION REGARDING BAC AT TIME OF DRIVING

The new statute slightly changes the presumption regarding a person's blood alcohol level at the time of the offense. The old law allowed, but did not require, the fact finder to presume that a person's BAC at the time of testing was the same as it was at the time of driving. The new law makes that presumption mandatory. While the presumption-like any other legal presumption-may be overcome, it now appears to be the defendant's burden to disprove the assumption by affirmative evidence.

IMPLIED CONSENT SUSPENSION LENGTHENED

The new law lengthens the time of implied consent suspensions to one year for a first implied consent refusal and five years for all subsequent implied consent refusals within a 7 year period.

MINOR TRANSPORTING ALCOHOL - IMPOUNDING OWNER'S VEHICLE

Within 30 days of a minor's conviction for transporting alcohol in a motor vehicle, the arresting officer may make a complaint against the owner of the vehicle to show cause why the vehicle should not be impounded. If the court determines that the vehicle was being driven with the express or implied consent of the owner (whether or not the owner knew the minor was transporting alcohol), and if the court determines that the vehicle is not needed by the owner in the direct pursuit of the owner's employment, the court may order the vehicle impounded for a minimum of 15 days and a maximum of 30 days.

CHANGES TO SENTENCING GUIDELINES OV-3 AND OV-18

The new law changes the sentence guidelines scoring to reflect the new lower .08% BAC threshold. Thus, OV-3 includes 50 points for death resulting from a drunk driving offense where the offender had a BAC of .08% or more. Similarly, OV 18 does away with the 5 points for a BAC of .07% or more but less than .10%, and folds all offenses with a BAC of .08% or more but less than .15% into the 10 point category.

EFFECTIVE DATE AND SUNSET PROVISION

The new statute takes effect September 30, 2003. For some reason, it includes a sunset provision, making the new .08% BAC threshold expire on October 1, 2013, at which time the BAC threshold reverts back to .10%.

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI   (ext. 231) NOW TO DISCUSS YOUR MICHIGAN DUI DWI MICHIGAN DRUNK DRIVING CASE OR

Free case review Image

The DUI attorneys and DWI lawyers listed on this site include nationally published authors on DUI laws and DWI laws. These Drunk Driving Defense Attorneys have appeared in over 75 local television stations and 229 newspapers nationwide.

Free Case Review

Book

Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence
This product provides an insider's perspective on the evolving technologies and procedures associated with the evidence associated with driving under the influence (DUI) charges. Leading defense attorneys guide the reader through the key stages and steps involved in successfully defending a client accused of driving while under the influence.

Ask A Question: Click Here